C2PA Content Credentials
Reads embedded content credentials and manifest data.
- Upload an image to run full server analysis.
AI watermark checker
Upload one image and review AI watermark signals, C2PA Content Credentials, SynthID indicators, and basic image provenance metadata.
Upload runs browser-side C2PA first. Full server analysis checks watermark and provenance channels only when the relevant provider keys are configured.
Reads embedded content credentials and manifest data.
Looks for trusted signer, claim generator, and AI provenance evidence.
Checks for Google AI invisible watermark signals through Gemini/SynthID capability.
Checks Meta/Stable Signature style watermark signals through an optional adapter.
Calls a generic AI image detector model as a secondary signal.
Records format, size, dimensions, and cache hash evidence.
AI watermark checks are strongest when they find signed provenance or a provider watermark. Missing signals do not prove the image is human-made or unedited.
AI watermark queries are different from generic AI detector queries. Searchers want to know whether a file contains durable provenance evidence, not just whether it looks generated.
Last updated: June 1, 2026
Reviews supported provider watermark channels, including SynthID-related evidence when available.
Reads C2PA locally before upload so signed provenance can be surfaced early in the review.
Adds file type, dimensions, and other basic details that help reviewers understand the evidence.
Different tools use different trust signals. A good AI watermark checker separates invisible marks, signed provenance, visible labels, and ordinary metadata instead of collapsing them into one score.
The practical rule is simple: a verified signal matters more than a visual guess. Missing evidence should be treated as inconclusive, especially for legal, editorial, moderation, or brand-safety decisions.
Confirmed provider watermark or valid signed provenance from a trusted tool or platform.
Tool names, claim generator data, AI-use assertions, or signer details inside a readable manifest.
Generic classifier scores or ordinary metadata that can help triage but should not be treated as proof.
No signal found means the checker found no supported evidence. It does not certify the image as real.
Watermark and provenance checks are best for workflows that need a defensible evidence trail.
Check whether a submitted image carries AI provenance before using it in reporting or publishing.
Triage product, avatar, or listing images where synthetic media disclosure matters.
Review influencer, ad, and user-generated creative before approval or escalation.
Use strong signals to prioritize manual review without over-trusting generic AI classifier scores.
Start with the dedicated SynthID checker when the question is specifically about Google AI watermark detection.
These official references define the provenance and watermark systems that this checker reports separately.
Official overview of invisible watermarking for AI-generated media.
Google help documentation for interpreting supported SynthID image and video checks.
The open provenance standard used by Content Credentials.
Provider verification example for supported AI image provenance signals.
How to read watermark, C2PA, SynthID, and metadata results.
It looks for supported AI watermark, provenance, and metadata signals such as SynthID, C2PA Content Credentials, trusted provider names, and basic file evidence.
No. A watermark is embedded into the generated media itself, while metadata is file information that can describe origin or edits. Metadata is usually easier to remove.
No. If no watermark or provenance signal is found, the result is inconclusive. The file may still be AI-generated by an unsupported model or may have lost evidence during editing.
C2PA can provide signed provenance records, while SynthID can provide invisible watermark evidence. Checking both reduces the chance of relying on a single weak signal.